Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia pattern is a frequent finding in patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome treated with bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation: current best evidence.

Patients with post-acute COVID-19 (PA-COVID) syndrome or long COVID-19 syndrome develop persistent symptoms and complications that last beyond 4 weeks of the initial infection. There is limited information regarding the pulmonary pathology in PA-COVID patients who require bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation (BOLT). Our experience with 40 lung explants from 20 PA-COVID patients who underwent BOLT is described. Clinicopathologic findings are correlated with best evidence from literature. The lung parenchyma showed bronchiectasis (n = 20) and severe interstitial fibrosis with areas resembling the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern of fibrosis (n = 20), interstitial fibrosis not otherwise specified (n = 20), and fibrotic cysts (n = 9). None of the explants exhibited a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern of fibrosis. Other parenchymal changes included multinucleated giant cells (n = 17), hemosiderosis (n = 16), peribronchiolar metaplasia (n = 19), obliterative bronchiolitis (n = 6), and microscopic honeycombing (n = 5). Vascular abnormalities included thrombosis of a lobar artery (n = 1) and microscopic thrombi in small vessels (n = 7). Systematic literature review identified 7 articles reporting the presence in 12 patients of interstitial fibrosis showing the NSIP pattern (n = 3), organizing pneumonia/diffuse alveolar damage (n = 4) and not otherwise specified (n = 3) patterns. All but one of these studies also reported the presence of multinucleated giant cells and none of the studies reported the presence of severe vascular abnormalities. PA-COVID patients undergoing BOLT show a pattern of fibrosis that resembles a mixed cellular-fibrotic NSIP pattern and generally lack severe vascular complications. As the NSIP pattern of fibrosis is often associated with autoimmune diseases, additional studies are needed to understand the mechanism of disease and learn whether this information can be used for therapeutic purposes.

Lymphoid Interstitial Pneumonia (LIP) Revisited: A Critical Reappraisal of the Histologic Spectrum of "Radiologic" and "Pathologic" LIP in the Context of Diffuse Benign Lymphoid Proliferations of the Lung.

The use of lymphoid interstitial pneumonia (LIP) as a diagnostic term has changed considerably since its introduction. Utilizing a multi-institutional collection of 201 cases from the last 20 years that demonstrate features associated with the LIP rubric, we compared cases meeting strict histologic criteria of LIP per American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) consensus ("pathologic LIP"; n=62) with cystic cases fulfilling radiologic ATS/ERS criteria ("radiologic LIP"; n=33) and with other diffuse benign lymphoid proliferations. "Pathologic LIP" was associated with immune dysregulation including autoimmune disorders and immune deficiency, whereas "radiologic LIP" was only seen with autoimmune disorders. No case of idiopathic LIP was found. On histology, "pathologic LIP" represented a subgroup of 70% (62/88) of cases with the distinctive pattern of diffuse expansile lymphoid infiltrates. In contrast, "radiologic LIP" demonstrated a broad spectrum of inflammatory patterns, airway-centered inflammation being most common (52%; 17/33). Only 5 cases with radiologic cysts also met consensus ATS/ERS criteria for "pathologic LIP." Overall, broad overlap was observed with the remaining study cases that failed to meet consensus criteria for "radiologic LIP" and/or "pathologic LIP." These data raise concerns about the practical use of the term LIP as currently defined. What radiologists and pathologist encounter as LIP differs remarkably, but neither "radiologic LIP" nor "pathologic LIP" present with sufficiently distinct findings to delineate such cases from other patterns of diffuse benign lymphoid proliferations. As a result of this study, we believe LIP should be abandoned as a pathologic and radiologic diagnosis.

Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: A Review of the Past and Emerging Therapies.

PurposeThis article is an in-depth review of the complex classification, diagnosis, and treatment of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP), as well as emergence of new treatment options. Summary: Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias consist of various subgroup classifications that require expert analysis of imaging and histology to accurately diagnose this broad group of patients. Timely and accurate assessment of these patients is key in developing an appropriate pharmacological plan. The pathophysiology of IIP is not well understood but has been linked to an immune response resulting in inflammation, fibrosis, or proliferation of lung tissue which reduces lung function. Lung transplantation is currently the only curative option for treatment, but many new antiproliferative and immunosuppressive agents are being used to effectively slow the progression of lung dysfunction. Conclusion: An often mixed radiological and histological pattern along with the invasive nature of biopsy for gold standard diagnosis create a challenge for the accurate identification of IIP. Further understanding of these idiopathic interstitial pneumonias will pave the way forward to the emergence of new treatment options and updates to standards of care.

Sensitivity of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of different interstitial lung diseases.

The accuracy of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) in each disease for pathological and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnosis is not yet established. METHOD: We investigated 431 patients who were classified by MDD diagnosis and were grouped into the disease categories. For each category or disease, we used TBLC samples to calculate the sensitivities of the pathological diagnosis compared with MDD diagnoses. Further, we compared these sensitivities to pathological diagnoses with all clinical/radiological information. RESULT: The sensitivity for diagnosing idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIPs) with TBLC was higher than connective tissue disease associated ILD (CTD-ILD). Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and some CTD-ILDs were diagnosed with lower sensitivities compared to IPF. The sensitivity of pathological diagnosis with all clinical/radiological information in IPF was higher than in iNSIP, but not significantly different from other diseases. The overall sensitivity of the pathological diagnosis with clinical/radiological information was 69.0%, significantly higher than without clinical/radiological information. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of pathological diagnosis with TBLC was low for some diseases except IPF. The addition of all clinical/radiological information increased the sensitivity of pathology diagnosis by TBLC, which was no less sensitive than IPF for all diseases except iNSIP.

[Clinical characteristics of 6 children with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia].

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of 6 children with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical manifestations, examinations, treatment and prognosis of 6 children with IIP who were hospitalized in Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2015 to March 2020. Results: Of the 6 children, 2 were males and 4 were females, aged 4.8 to10.6 years. All children had a subacute onset, and presented with cough, shortness of breath and cyanosis. The lung high-resolution CT (HRCT) showed diffuse patchiness in bilateral lung fields in all the children and reticular pattern in 2 cases. Pulmonary function test found moderate to severe mixed defect in 5 children. Lung biopsy was performed in 4 children. All of the 6 children were treated with systemic glucocorticoids, of whom 2 cases had additional inhaled glucocorticoids. Four children were finally diagnosed as cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP), whose lung HRCT return to normal in 1-11 months. Two children were finally diagnosed as nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and had long-term residual fibrosis on lung HRCT. The 6 children were followed up for 1 year to 6 years and 5 months after discontinuation of systemic glucocorticoids, and all had no recurrence. Conclusions: The clinical characteristics of IIP in children are subacute onset presented with cough, shortness of breath, cyanosis and diffuse patchiness in bilateral lungs on HRCT. The common subtypes of IIP in children are COP and NSIP. Systemic glucocorticoid is effective for IIP in children and there is a good prognosis overall.

Prognostic implication of IgG4 and IgG1-positive cell infiltration in the lung in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.

Immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-positive cells are rarely observed in the lungs of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). IgG1 may be more pathogenic than IgG4, with IgG4 having both pathogenic and protective roles in IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). However, the role of both IgG1 and IgG4 in IIPs remains unclear. We hypothesized that patients with IgG4-positive interstitial pneumonia manifest different clinical characteristics than patients with IgG4-RD. Herein, we identified the correlation of the degree of infiltration of IgG1- and IgG4-positive cells with IIP prognosis, using a Japanese nationwide cloud-based database. We included eighty-eight patients diagnosed with IIPs after multidisciplinary discussion, from April 2009 to March 2014. IgG4-positive cell infiltration was identified in 12/88 patients with IIPs and 8/41 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Additionally, 31/88 patients with IIPs and 19/41 patients with IPF were diagnosed as having IgG1-positive cell infiltration. IgG4-positive IIPs tended to have a better prognosis. Conversely, overall survival in cases with IgG1-positive IPF was significantly worse. IIPs were prevalent with IgG1- or IgG4-positive cell infiltration. IgG1-positive cell infiltration in IPF significantly correlated with a worse prognosis. Overall, evaluating the degree of IgG1-positive cell infiltration may be prognostically useful in cases of IPF.

Quantitative CT and machine learning classification of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quantitative computed tomography (QCT) features and QCT feature-based machine learning (ML) models in classifying interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). To compare QCT-ML and deep learning (DL) models' performance. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 1085 patients with pathologically proven usual interstitial pneumonitis (UIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis (NSIP), and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) who underwent peri-biopsy chest CT. Kruskal-Wallis test evaluated QCT feature associations with each ILD. QCT features, patient demographics, and pulmonary function test (PFT) results trained eXtreme Gradient Boosting (training/validation set n = 911) yielding 3 models: M1 = QCT features only; M2 = M1 plus age and sex; M3 = M2 plus PFT results. A DL model was also developed. ML and DL model areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared for multiclass (UIP vs. NSIP vs. CHP) and binary (UIP vs. non-UIP) classification performances. RESULTS: The majority (69/78 [88%]) of QCT features successfully differentiated the 3 ILDs (adjusted p ≤ 0.05). All QCT-ML models achieved higher AUC than the DL model (multiclass AUC micro-averages 0.910, 0.910, 0.925, and 0.798 and macro-averages 0.895, 0.893, 0.925, and 0.779 for M1, M2, M3, and DL respectively; binary AUC 0.880, 0.899, 0.898, and 0.869 for M1, M2, M3, and DL respectively). M3 demonstrated statistically significant better performance compared to M2 (∆AUC: 0.015, CI: [0.002, 0.029]) for multiclass prediction. CONCLUSIONS: QCT features successfully differentiated pathologically proven UIP, NSIP, and CHP. While QCT-based ML models outperformed a DL model for classifying ILDs, further investigations are warranted to determine if QCT-ML, DL, or a combination will be superior in ILD classification. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative CT features successfully differentiated pathologically proven UIP, NSIP, and CHP. • Our quantitative CT-based machine learning models demonstrated high performance in classifying UIP, NSIP, and CHP histopathology, outperforming a deep learning model. • While our quantitative CT-based machine learning models performed better than a DL model, additional investigations are needed to determine whether either or a combination of both approaches delivers superior diagnostic performance.

Classification and Pathological Diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia.

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is a group of progressive lower respiratory tract diseases of unknown origin characterized by diffuse alveolitis and alveolar structural disorders leading to pulmonary fibrillation and hypertension, pulmonary heart disease, and right heart failure due to pulmonary fibrosis, and more than half of them die from respiratory failure. To address these problems of overly complex prediction methods and large data sets involved in the prediction process of interstitial pneumonia, this paper proposes a prediction model for interstitial pneumonia which is based on the Gaussian Parsimonious Bayes algorithm. Three usual tests of pneumonia, specifically from various patients, were collected as the sample set. These samples are divided into training and testing sets. Additionally, a cross-validation strategy was used to avoid the overfitting problem. The results showed that the prediction model based on the Gaussian Parsimonious Bayes algorithm predicted 92% accuracy on the test set, and the Parsimonious Bayes method could directly predict the final detection of interstitial pneumonia based on the usual pneumonia test pneumonia. In addition, it was found that the closer the data distribution of the sample set was to a normal distribution, the higher the prediction accuracy was, and then, after excluding pneumonia from the test below 60 points, the prediction accuracy reached 96%.

Clinical features and long-term prognosis of acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia histologically confirmed by surgical lung biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia (AFOP) is a rare interstitial pneumonia characterized by intra-alveolar fibrin deposition and organizing pneumonia. The clinical manifestations and long-term prognosis of AFOP are unclear. Our objective was to investigate the clinical features and prognosis of AFOP. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with AFOP by surgical lung biopsy between January 2011 and May 2018 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiologic findings, treatment, and outcomes of AFOP. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with histologically confirmed lung biopsies were included. The median follow-up duration was 2.4 (range, 0.1-82) months. The median age was 55 (range, 33-75) years, and four patients were immunocompromised. Fever was the most common clinical presentation (86.7%). Patchy ground-glass opacities and/or consolidations were the most predominant findings on chest computed tomography images. Nine patients (60%) received mechanical ventilator care, and eight patients (53.3%) died. The non-survivors tended to have slightly higher body mass index (BMI) and a long interval between symptom onset and diagnosis than the survivors, but these findings were not statistically significant. Among seven survivors, five patients were discharged without dyspnea and oxygen supplement. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of AFOP was variable. Although AFOP was fatal, most of the patients who recovered from AFOP maintained normal life without supplemental oxygen therapy and respiratory symptoms.

Discrimination between NSIP- and IPF-Derived Fibroblasts Based on Multi-Parameter Characterization of Their Growth, Morphology and Physic-Chemical Properties.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the research presented here was to find a set of parameters enabling discrimination between three types of fibroblasts, i.e., healthy ones and those derived from two disorders mimicking each other: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). METHODS: The morphology and growth of cells were traced using fluorescence microscopy and analyzed quantitatively using cell proliferation and substrate cytotoxicity indices. The viability of cells was recorded using MTS assays, and their stiffness was examined using atomic force microscopy (AFM) working in force spectroscopy (FS) mode. To enhance any possible difference in the examined parameters, experiments were performed with cells cultured on substrates of different elasticities. Moreover, the chemical composition of cells was determined using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), combined with sophisticated analytical tools, i.e., Multivariate Curve Resolution (MCR) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). RESULTS: The obtained results demonstrate that discrimination between cell lines derived from healthy and diseased patients is possible based on the analysis of the growth of cells, as well as their physical and chemical properties. In turn, the comparative analysis of the cellular response to altered stiffness of the substrates enables the identification of each cell line, including distinguishing between IPF- and NSIP-derived fibroblasts.

Demystifying idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: time for more etiology-focused nomenclature in interstitial lung disease.

INTRODUCTION: A major focus of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has centered on disorders termed idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) which include, among others, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, and respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease. AREAS COVERED: We review the radiologic and histologic patterns for the nine disorders classified by multidisciplinary approach as IIP, and describe the remarkable amount of published epidemiologic, translational, and molecular studies demonstrating their associations with numerous yet definitive environmental exposures, occupational exposures, pulmonary diseases, systemic diseases, medication toxicities, and genetic variants. EXPERT OPINION: In the 21st century, these disorders termed IIPs are rarely idiopathic, but rather are well-described radiologic and histologic patterns of lung injury that are associated with a wide array of diverse etiologies. Accordingly, the idiopathic nomenclature is misleading and confusing, and may also promote a lack of inquisitiveness, suggesting the end rather than the beginning of a thorough diagnostic process to identify ILD etiology and initiate patient-centered management. A shift toward more etiology-focused nomenclature will be beneficial to all, including patients hoping for better life quality and disease outcome, general medicine and pulmonary physicians furthering their ILD knowledge, and expert ILD clinicians and researchers who are advancing the ILD field.

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis.

The term idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis refers to a rare interstitial lung disease that predominantly involves the upper lobes. It has been considered a rare subtype of interstitial lung disease since 2013, when it was included in the joint consensus statement on the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Currently, two distinct types of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis are recognized: the idiopathic type for cases in which it has not been possible to establish a specific etiology and a secondary type associated with a variety of different causes. The diagnosis of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis must be managed from a combined clinical and radiological perspective. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the imaging method of choice for the evaluation and diagnosis of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. In many cases, the diagnosis will be based exclusively on the HRCT findings and histologic confirmation will be unnecessary. This article describes the clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, discussing the different associations with this entity and its differential diagnosis.

Bimodal fibrosis in a novel mouse model of bleomycin-induced usual interstitial pneumonia.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is pathologically represented by usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Conventional bleomycin models used to study pathogenic mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis display transient inflammation and fibrosis, so their relevance to UIP is limited. We developed a novel chronic induced-UIP (iUIP) model, inducing fibrosis in D1CC×D1BC transgenic mice by intra-tracheal instillation of bleomycin mixed with microbubbles followed by sonoporation (BMS). A bimodal fibrotic lung disease was observed over 14 wk, with an acute phase similar to nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), followed by partial remission and a chronic fibrotic phase with honeycombing similar to UIP. In this secondary phase, we observed poor vascularization despite elevated PDGFRß expression. γ2PF- and MMP7-positive epithelial cells, consistent with an invasive phenotype, were predominantly adjacent to fibrotic areas. Most invasive cells were Scgb1a1 and/or Krt5 positive. This iUIP mouse model displays key features of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and has identified potential mechanisms contributing to the onset of NSIP and progression to UIP. The model will provide a useful tool for the assessment of therapeutic interventions to oppose acute and chronic fibrosis.

The role of interleukin-6 as a prognostic biomarker for predicting acute exacerbation in interstitial lung diseases.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are chronic, parenchymal lung diseases with a variable clinical course and a poor prognosis. Within various clinical courses, acute exacerbation (AE) is a devastating condition with significant morbidity and high mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of interleukin-6 (IL-6) to predict AE and prognosis in patients with ILD. METHODS: Eighty-three patients who were diagnosed with ILD from 2016 to 2019 at the Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea, were included and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 20 months. The mean age was 68.1 years and 65.1% of the patients were men with 60.2% of patients being ever-smokers. Among ILDs, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was the most common disease (68.7%), followed by connective tissue disease-associated ILD (14.5%), cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (9.6%), and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (6.0%). The serum levels of IL-6 were measured at diagnosis with ILD and sequentially at follow-up visits. During the follow-ups, 15 (18.1%) patients experienced an acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD and among them, four (26.7%) patients died. In the multivariable analysis, high levels of IL-6 (OR 1.014, 95% CI: 1.001-1.027, p = 0.036) along with lower baseline saturations of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) were independent risk factors for AE. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.815 (p < 0.001) and the optimal cut-off value of serum IL-6 to predict AE was 25.20 pg/mL with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 80.6%. In the multivariable Cox analysis, a high level of serum IL-6 (HR 1.007, 95% CI: 1.001-1.014, p = 0.018) was only an independent risk factor for mortality in ILD patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, a high level of serum IL-6 is a useful biomarker to predict AE and poor prognosis in patients with ILD.

Computed tomography findings of current nonspecific interstitial pneumonia based on the 2013 updated classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: What is a characteristic of previously diagnosed nonspecific interstitial pneumonia excluded from the updated classification.

PURPOSE: To evaluate computed tomography (CT) findings of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) based on the current classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and elucidate a characteristic of previously diagnosed NSIP excluded from the current classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 74 patients with biopsy-proven NSIP (idiopathic NSIP [I-NSIP], 39 patients; NSIP associated with connective tissue disease [CTD-NSIP], 35 patients). Among patients who were compatible with the current classification of IIPs, 29 and 21 were categorized as having current I-NSIP and current CTD-NSIP, respectively. The remaining 24 patients were categorized as having previous I-NSIP or previous CTD-NSIP due to the primary pathologic diagnosis of cellular NSIP or associated findings of acute inflammatory changes. CT findings were evaluated and compared among the four groups. RESULTS: Current I-NSIP was indicated by ground-glass attenuation and reticulation with traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis in predominantly peribronchovascular areas of the lower lung zone. The previous I-NSIP group tended to show broader airspace consolidation than the current I-NSIP group (p = 0.068). The previous CTD-NSIP group showed significantly broader airspace consolidation than the current I-NSIP group (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Broad airspace consolidation is a characteristic of previously diagnosed CTD-NSIP excluded from the current classification of IIPs.

The pathogenesis and pathology of idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis.

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) is a rare subtype of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias that consists of elastofibrosis involving the lung parenchyma and pleural collagenous fibrosis predominantly located in the upper lobes. IPPFE has various distinct clinical and physiological characteristics, including platythorax and a marked decrease of forced vital capacity with an increased residual volume on a respiratory function test. The concept of IPPFE is now widely recognized and some diagnostic criteria have been proposed. In addition, the accumulation of cases has revealed the pathological features of IPPFE. However, little is known about the pathogenesis or the process of disease formation in IPPFE. This review article will provide a summary of the pathological features and previously reported hypotheses on disease formation in IPPFE, to discuss the potential etiologies and pathogenesis of IPPFE.

Clinical significance of minor salivary gland biopsy in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Significant overlap may occur between idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and connective tissue diseases (CTDs) that do not meet the established classification criteria for any known CTDs (i.e., occult CTD). Performing minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) to detect occult primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS) in IIP patients is not well studied. METHODS: Consecutive IIP patients underwent MSGB to determine the prevalence of positive MSGB findings. Furthermore, we characterised the clinical, physiological and serological profiles of the MSGB-positive patients. Cox regression models were used to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: The data of 155 patients with IIP were available for analysis. Sixty patients (38.7%) had positive MSGB findings. Of them, the mean age was 63.3 years, 51.6% were women, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) was the predominant pattern (63.3%), and seronegative antibodies (61.6%) were likely. Patients with positive MSGB findings had significantly greater survival than those with negative MSGB findings (p = 0.041). After stratifying the MSGB cohort based on the presence of a UIP pattern, no significant difference in survival was noted between those with positive MSGB-UIP pattern and those with a negative MSGB-UIP pattern (p = 0.231). Multivariate analysis on all UIP patients showed that higher forced vital capacity (p = 0.010) and smoking status (p = 0.035) were independently associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of IIP patients had underlying occult CTD, highlighting the importance of performing MSGB to identify the salivary component of pSS when evaluating patients with interstitial lung disease of undetermined aetiology.

Clinical, radiological, and pathological evaluation of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern compared with NSIP in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

BACKGROUND: Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and organizing pneumonia (OP) are major subtypes of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and closely related to connective tissue diseases (CTDs). "NSIP with OP overlap" is a controversial finding that has recently appeared in the criteria of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). However, details of this controversial entity are not well known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern in IIPs and to identify differences from idiopathic NSIP (iNSIP). METHODS: In 524 patients with interstitial pneumonia from 39 institutes who underwent surgical lung biopsy, 444 were diagnosed as IIPs by a multidisciplinary discussion meeting via a cloud-based integrated database. Among these patients, 44 (9.9%) who had iNSIP and 21 (4.7%) with histopathologically-defined "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern (a pathological NSIP and OP pattern, but without a UIP pattern) were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: Patients with "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern showed a significantly greater extent of consolidation (p < 0.001), more subpleural ground glass attenuation (p = 0.036), and more peripheral + bronchovascular distribution (p = 0.009) on high-resolution computed tomography than those with iNSIP. The incidences of newly-developed CTDs during follow-up was similar between the groups and polymyositis/dermatomyositis was the most frequent CTD in both groups. Nearly half of the patients fulfilled IPAF criteria, but no significant difference was found between iNSIP and "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern (47.7% vs. 42.9, p = 0.712). The incidence of acute exacerbation and the survival rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern is 4.7% in IIPs. The frequency of newly-developed CTDs during follow-up, mainly polymyositis/dermatomyositis, the frequency of acute exacerbation, and the survival rate in "NSIP with OP overlap" pattern are similar to those of iNSIP.

Usefulness of surgical lung biopsies after cryobiopsies when pathological results are inconclusive or show a pattern suggestive of a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Although increasing data supports the use of transbronchial lung cryobiopsies (TBLCs) for the diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs), its role as an alternative to surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of additional SLBs performed in selected patients after TBLCs. METHOD: We conducted a multicentric Belgian prospective trial in which SLBs were performed after TBLCs when the pathological diagnosis was uncertain or if a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern was observed hypothesizing that SLB could provide additional information and that a co-existent UIP pattern could be missed. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with TBLCs performed for a DPLD were included in the study between April 2015 and December 2019. A specific histological diagnosis was obtained in 52 patients (64%) whereas no pathological diagnosis following TBLCs was obtained in 13 patients (16%) and a pattern suggestive of a NSIP was observed in 16 patients (20%). Fourteen out of these 29 patients had SLBs after TBLCs. SLBs showed a UIP pattern in 11 (79%), a pattern suggestive of a hypersensitivity pneumonitis in two (14%) and a NSIP pattern in one patient (7%). Among the 16 patients with pathological NSIP following TBLCs, six underwent a SLBs showing a UIP in five and confirming a NSIP in one patient only. A retrospective pathological analysis of patients having both procedures showed a lower diagnostic confidence and agreement among pathologists for TBLCs compared to SLBs. Major factors underlying the added value of SLBs were the bigger size of the sample as well as the subpleural localization of the biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: TBLCs are useful in the setting of DPLDs with a good diagnostic yield. However, our study suggests that SLB provides critical additional information in case TBLCs are inconclusive or show a pattern suggestive of a NSIP, questioning the accuracy of TBLC to adequately identify this histological pattern.

Disease course and prognosis of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (iPPFE) is a rare interstitial lung disease characterized by unique radiological and pathological findings. However, pathological evaluations are available only in a limited number of patients. Therefore, several clinical diagnostic criteria have been proposed. Nevertheless, the applicability of these criteria has not yet been validated. Moreover, the clinical course of iPPFE and its prognosis have not yet been completely elucidated. METHODS: The present study assessed previously proposed clinical diagnostic criteria by comparing the clinical features between pathologically diagnosed iPPFE (p-iPPFE) and clinically diagnosed iPPFE (c-iPPFE). Subsequently, the clinical features of iPPFE were characterized and compared with those of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF, n = 323). RESULTS: Clinical characteristics of c-iPPFE (n = 27) and p-iPPFE (n = 35) were similar. No significant difference was observed in terms of prognosis between c-iPPFE and p-iPPFE. The number of patients with iPPFE (both c-iPPFE and p-iPPFE) who developed lung cancer was significantly lower than that of patients with IPF. However, acute exacerbation (AE) showed similar incidence in patients with iPPFE and IPF. Survival of patients with iPPFE was significantly worse than that of patients with IPF (5-year survival rate: 38.5% vs. 63.5%, p < 0.0001), and the most common cause of death was chronic respiratory failure (73.8%), followed by AE (14.3%). Male gender was the only poor prognostic factor of iPPFE. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated efficiency of clinical diagnosis and also revealed clinically important characteristics of iPPFE that should be considered for management of iPPFE.